latoga labs

Alliances & Partnership Advising

  • About
  • Contact
  • View latoga’s profile on Twitter
  • View greglato’s profile on LinkedIn

© 2006–2026 · Log in

Archives for February 2008

Wanted: Voting Machine by Apple

February 8, 2008 Leave a Comment

Tuesday was the primary election here in California. Luckily, my polling place is litterally two blocks from my house in a neighbor’s garage. On Tuesday morning, as I waited in a line of 3 people at 7am for the wonderful folks who run the polling station to figure out how to turn on the optical scanning machine, I realized what could be the greatest risk to our Democracy.

Technology and electronic voting machines.

If you were to take a survey of the age of the people who volunteer their time to run most of the election polling places in America, the vast majority of them would fall into the category of senior citizen. This, in its own right, is not a bad thing. But, think back to the challenges that most of the senior citizens you know have with setting the clock on their VCRs. And that’s not even taking into account much more recent and sophisticated home electronics like the latest TVs or DVRs.

And yet, once we start rolling out electronic voting machines, these will be the same people who will have to run them. In general, I feel confident in saying that the technology industry as a whole doesn’t have the best track record for making things easy to use. So, even thought I have not ever seen nor worked with any electronic voting machine, I feel that we (the technology industry, voting machine manufacturers, society in general) may be setting up our democracy for a huge failure.

One of the common statements in high tech revolves around describing what you do for a living: “Describe it so that your mother would understand it.” So, on a similar note, our future electronic voting machines need to be designed such that our mothers (and fathers) could not only cast a vote on it, but also set them up and deal with any production issues that may arise.

This is why I think Apple should make a voting machine. The common statement from nearly ever modern day Mac owner is “it just works”. If Apple can do that for something as sophisticated and mutli-purpose as a modern day computer, image what they could do with a single purpose voting machine!

An Apple voting machine combined with an open source voting software would be a stellar combination.

Which brings up an interesting point. Are there any open source voting software solutions? We never hear about this topic in the media. We only hear about which states have decertified which voting machines or which voting machine was recently deemed ‘hackable’.

Interestingly, after a quick search, I came across the Open Voting Consortium (which I had never heard of before). They describe themselves as a not-for-profit organization dedicated to the development, maintenance, and delivery of trustable and open voting systems for use in public elections. The interesting thing to note is that they don’t seem to be developing an open source voting system. Neither does VoteTrustUSA nor their parent organization Verified Voting Foundation.

In the true sense of democracy, we should have our voting systems be completely transparent. So that anyone who was interested could look in and see how it worked, including independent experts.

I’m shocked that there doesn’t appear to be a true open source voting software initiative yet. But then again, I’m sure Apple isn’t working on their own voting machine either. Probably for the same reasons…just not enough money to be made by making either of these two items in the fashion that has our society’s best interests at heart.

Filed Under: Opinion Tagged With: Election, Opinion, Voting Machines

Super Bowl Traffic Rush

February 3, 2008 Leave a Comment

On the same topic of my previous post, I expect that the website admins at GoDaddy.com are currently watching their own traffic graph “go up and to the right”. They used their rejected ad from the Super Bowl to drive people to their website with a teaser ad during the game. It would be interesting to see what their traffic graph looks like from the minutes before their ad ran through the following hour….

BTW: After the first quarter of the Super Bowl…the FedEx carrier pigeon ad was the funniest.

Update: 4:25pm PST: Ok, looks like I’ll be real-time blogging my comments about the commercials from the game. The Garmin Napoleon commercial has to get special mention due to the fact that we have a Napoleon as part of our family. –>

Update: 5:20pm PST (Post Half Time): So far during the game, there have been a few humorous comercials, but the FedEx carrier pigeon one still received the largest laugh. I think it had to do with the build up and then the over the top nature along with the visual details in the punch line.

I think the best commercials for grabbing you and building on the suspense were the Audi R8 ad (viewable on their site) and the SoBe Life Water ad (also viewable on their site). Both commercials were visually simplified, built up to something that you knew was going to happen, but had no idea what, and then cut to the product in the last 5-10 seconds of the commercial. Simplicity is the key to both of them.

Update: 7:30 PM PST (After The Game):  So, the last 2 minutes turned out to be the best part of the game with an exciting ending, hence the single wrap up post.  I wasn’t really that interested in the game (until those last 2 minutes) since the Packers weren’t playing, hence the time to write these comments.  The second half tends to not have the best commercials.  There were only two sets that I found interesting.  The Coke commercials (both the parade balloons and the political debate ads) were cute and had subtle humor built into them that I appreciated (did you notice in the parade balloon ad, the little girl looking up at the balloons…holding the football and looking like…).  I also thought the E*Trade commercials with the baby trading stocks to be perversely humorous (viewable on their site).

Of course, you can view all the commercials from the game on the Super Bowl Ads Myspace page.

Filed Under: Marketing

Super Bowl Advertising Correlation

February 1, 2008 1 Comment

I read an interesting article in today’s Wall Street Journal that talked about the correlation between advertising in the Super Bowl and stock performance: Super Bowl Sponsor’s Stocks Tend to Outplay S&P 500 in Week Following Big Game (login required). Researchers from the University of Wisconsin found a correlation between the companies that advertise during the Super Bowl and those same companies stock prices during the week after the big game. Those companies that ran ads during the bowl outperformed the S&P 500 during the week following the game in 10 of the past 12 years.

Does this mean that the $2.7 million for a 30 second spot is worth the money? For some, it might. As long as you have discretionary marketing budget to spend on that advertising, you can capture a lot of eye balls during the game. The one time during the year when you don’t want to Tivo the game to miss the commercials.

This reminded me of the 2000 Super Bowl. At the time, I was working for a company that produced software to manage the web traffic on the largest websites of the day. One of our new customers was a startup called OurBeginnings.com (yes, during that era when companies name was also their web address). They spent a large portion of their funding to do a Super Bowl advertising launch for their online invitation and card printing service (think wedding invitations and the name starts to make sense).

The week leading up to the game was a scramble to get their new data center and infrastructure installed, tested, and operational. During the game, we had a staff of people watching the site from different parts of the country, myself included. It was quite amazing to watch their logo come up during the 15 minute pre-game session they sponsored and then watch the traffic to their website go up. The most impressive was the 30 second ad spot they bought; as soon as it finished playing and as fast as I could switch my eyes from the TV screen to my laptop screen, I literally watched the website traffic go up and to the right. We were monitoring the site in real-time and I witnessed the spike as it happened.

The image to the right is a screen capture that I took of the statistics the next morning. It is quite amazing how the Super Bowl ads can have such an immediate impact on the viewers. The large spike is right after the 30 second ad ran and you can see that the volume of visitors is considerably above average for the few hours after that spike (click the image for a larger view).

So, I’m not surprised that those Super Bowl ads were impacting people still for a week after the game. Just think about how many times you have talked about the best ads from the game during that week? I’m sure there are a lot of marketing executives who love to point to this study to justify the investment.

(Oh, about OurBeginnings…just like Pets.com, Ameriquest, and others that have advertised during the Bowl and then disappeared…they went out of business about a year later, after having passed up a $40M acquisition offer. 🙂 )

Update:  I was reminded by my friend Richard Lewis, who was the CTO of ActiveIngredients which was behind OurBeginnings, that they sponsored a 30 minute segment of the pre-game show, ran 5 ads during the Super Bowl (the first one aired is what generated that huge spike), and were offered $45M for the company.

Filed Under: Marketing Tagged With: advertising, Super Bowl

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Next Page »

About latoga labs

With over 25 years of partnering leadership and direct GTM experience, Greg A. Lato provides consulting services to companies in all stages of their partnering journey to Ecosystem Led Growth.